Skip to main content

Bates v Northern Territory of Australia [2014] FCA 156

Year
2014
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Forum
Federal Court
Legislation considered
s 87 Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
s 94A Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Summary

Rangiah J

In this consent determination, the Court recognised the non-exclusive native title rights of 3 estate groups, [Y]ijiparta group, Gurungu/Kulumintini group and Warranangku group, in the Tandyidgee Pastoral Lease (Perpetual Pastoral Lease No. 949), an area of some 2807 square kilometres.

This application was considered as part of seven applications together because of their geographic proximity to one another and at the request of the pastoralists and with the consent of the applicants and the Northern Territory.

Rights and interests

Non-exclusive native title rights were recognised and include the right to:

travel over, move about on and have access to those areas;
hunt and fish on the land and waters of those areas;
gather and use natural resources;
take and use natural water;
live and camp, including to erect shelters and other structures;
light fires for domestic purposes, but not for the clearance of vegetation;
conduct and to participate in  cultural activities and practices, ceremonies, meetings and teaching;
maintain and protect sites and places of significance under traditional laws and customs;
share or exchange subsistence and other traditional resources obtained on or from those areas; and
conduct activities necessary to give effect to the rights referred to above.

The native title rights and interests were identified by Rangiah J as being for the personal or communal needs of the native title holders, which are of a domestic or subsistence nature, and not for any commercial or business purpose.

Rangiah J stated, at paragraph 12, that:

The determination of native title rights and interests are important to the Applicant and to the Aboriginal estate groups because they are a recognition by the Court on behalf of the Australian community that their ancestors inhabited this country prior to European settlement. The orders that the Court is about to make today are a recognition that they enjoyed such rights as the traditional owners of the land, and have done so since that time.