Skip to main content

Cutta v Northern Territory of Australia [2014] FCA 157

Year
2014
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Forum
Federal Court
Legislation considered
s 87 Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
s 94A Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Summary

Rangiah J

In this matter the Court made orders by consent recognised the non-exclusive native title rights and interests of four estate groups (the Karrkarrkuwaja (Kalkalkuwaja) group, Jukatayi Palyarinji group , Walanyja group and Kurtinja group) over the land and waters in the Northern Territory bounded by the Anthony Lagoon Pastoral Lease (Perpetual Lease No. 1016), an area of some 6483 square kilometres.

Rangiah J considered seven applications, including this one, for determination of native title over seven pastoral leases of a total of approximately 37000km² of land in the Northern Territory.  These matters were heard together because of their geographic proximity to one another and were dealt with as a group at the request of the pastoralists and with the consent of the applicants and the Northern Territory.

Rights and interests

Non-exclusive native title rights were recognised including the right to:

travel over, move about on and have access to those areas;
hunt and fish on the land and waters of those areas;
gather and use natural resources;
take and use natural water;
live and camp, including to erect shelters and other structures;
light fires for domestic purposes, but not for the clearance of vegetation;
conduct and to participate in  cultural activities and practices, ceremonies, meetings and teaching;
maintain and protect sites and places of significance under traditional laws and customs;
share or exchange subsistence and other traditional resources obtained on or from those areas; and
conduct activities necessary to give effect to the rights referred to above.

The native title rights and interests were recognised by Rangiah J as being for the personal or communal needs of the native title holders which are of a domestic or subsistence nature and not for any commercial or business purpose.

The Court also ordered that:

the native title is not to be held on trust; and
an Aboriginal corporation, yet to be named, would be the prescribed body corporate for the purposes of s 57(2) NTA;
that there be no order to costs; and
that the parties may apply to establish:
precise locations and boundaries of public works and adjacent land and waters;
precise locations of the boundaries of pastoral improvements; and
whether pastoral improvements have been constructed unlawfully.

Rangiah J stated, at paragraph 12, that:

The determination of native title rights and interests are important to the Applicant and to the Aboriginal estate groups because they are a recognition by the Court on behalf of the Australian community that their ancestors inhabited this country prior to European settlement. The orders that the Court is about to make today are a recognition that they enjoyed such rights as the traditional owners of the land, and have done so since that time.