Please note: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people should be aware that this website may contain images, voices or names of deceased persons in photographs, film, audio recordings or printed material.

Some material may contain terms that reflect authors’ views, or those of the period in which the item was written or recorded, but may not be considered appropriate today. These views are not necessarily the views of AIATSIS. While the information may not reflect current understanding, it is provided in an historical context.

Agreeing to terms: What is a ‘comprehensive’ agreement?

issue paper cover
Mar, 2004
Editor/s: 
Product type: 
Issues paper
Volume title: 
Agreeing to terms: What is a ‘comprehensive’ agreement?
Volume number: 
2:26

Disappointment with both the process and outcomes of Native Title litigation has led to an increased emphasis on agreement making, including ‘comprehensive’ agreement making. In seeking to define a ‘comprehensive agreement’, it is evident that a broad range of agreements currently fall under this general description. Dr Stuart Bradfield discusses a range of current Australian agreements, and (briefly) agreement making in Canada, and suggests that there is value in distinguishing ‘comprehensive agreements’ as a separate type of agreement with a broad subject matter and a distinct process of negotiation which is underpinned by recognition of Indigenous peoples as political entities.

Journal title: 
Land, rights, laws: Issues of Native Title
Last reviewed: 17 Jul 2017

AIATSIS acknowledges the traditional owners of country throughout Australia and their continuing connection to land, culture and community.

We pay our respects to elders past and present.

Agreeing to terms: What is a ‘comprehensive’ agreement? | Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies

Error

Status message

queue_xmlsitemap_link_process: Launched in thread 1
The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.